Monday 13 February 2012

Film Industry - 2

                                            ****Continued from the last post****


As time progressed, the audience no longer cared for the histrionics of the people in movies. This generation comprised of actors and not artists, in the sense that they could somewhat act, but not effortlessly. The movies too grew thin on sensible stuff and all of a sudden they were accepted by the audience as well. The success of films in which a bike thief could turn a cop in the sequel to the same movie or where people felt entertained while watching a couple that sold Taj Mahal to a foreigner saying that it is their personal property bears witness to this. The most shocking of all was the one in which a dead mother on her daughter’s eighth birthday, endows her with the mission of getting her father married for the second time! The object of perplexion is that the mother died at the time of child birth and has NOT returned as a ghost either!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Heavens should be knowing how the letter with such an idiotic message landed in the girl's hand.........

The generation that came after this i.e the stars of today, are a bigger marvel. The actors can neither act nor are they exceptionally beautiful (except for a few). Today, all that one needs to do to become and actor is to head to Mumbai, walk the ramp and make sure that he/she appears in ads. Movies happen automatically. Gain footage in Mumbai ; the South Indian films happen on their own as the other way round is quite difficult. The real duty begins after becoming an actor. Whether or not, they like it, they need to do everything in their capacity to STAY IN THE NEWS! THEY CANNOT DARE TO LET PEOPLE FORGET THEM (very much like the politicians). Huge news about having refused to do a film and issuing ‘clarifications’ about not doing one, making “BOLD” statements about pre-marital sex and things of the sort, sporting new looks, walking out of parties or giving them a miss, fighting with co-stars or other colleagues or even changing boyfriends / girlfriends once in 6 months to 1 year are all some of the activities which our “STARS” are compelled to indulge in once they step into the film industry. They need designers to decide on what they should be wearing for a particular event and managers to confirm or deny the rubbish about them in the media. Besides managers, all stars need friends to act as “CLOSE SOURCES” to interact with the outer world. India has a section of the media which is all the time worried about people of this sort who are no better than politicians ; well some of them even step into politics if their innings in the film industry turns out to be a dud while others decently get married. This particular section of the media and the paparazzis must be penalized for having followed people who know nothing but to amass wealth by playing stupid roles or working as “AMBASSADORS” for certain brands. These people are of no practical use to the country or the film industry, either.

The other foolish trend was in assigning specific names to the film industries of each region. After the Hindi film industry turned out to be "Bollywood" the southern industries foolishly followed the suit. The Telugu film industry became "Tollywood", The Tamil film industry became "Kollywood", The Malayalam film industry became "Mollywood" while the Kannada film industry became "Sandalwood". It is said that late Hindi film actor, the legendary Amrish Puri always displayed intolerance towards the word "Bollywood". In his own words, "America has a town by the name Hollywood where films are produced. Hence those films are called Hollywood films. Does India have any town by the name Bollywood? It is a name which the westerners have coined to make fun of us. Please don't take pride in calling our industry as 'Bollywood' as it was meant to be an insulting term ". Even to this day, veteran actors of the industry like Om Puri, Naseeruddin Shah refrain from using the term "Bollywood". Among all the other "woods" in India, 'Sandalwood' makes some sense if not fully. The sandalwood is available in abundance in Karnataka and is of the best quality in the entire country. So taking into account, the term 'Sandalwood' makes sense ; else not.

Hardly anything can be said about the movies and the movie makers of today. They have several tens of millions of rupees to spend on making a movie that lasts for 2 hours but when it comes to paying taxes to the government, all are on the streets saying that taxes would increase the cost of film-making. They have a tendency to obtain the ‘A’ certificate for movies (which means that the movies are strictly restricted for adult viewing unlike ‘U/A’ which allows children beyond 12 years of age and ‘U’ which calls for unrestricted exhibition) in a bid to attract the teenagers! This certificate would tempt the youth to watch the movies with the intention of watching explicit scenes of sexual content. In short, adult certificate is obtained to draw the minors to watching movies and the technique used to obtain the 'A' rating is "REALISTIC PORTRAYAL OF CHARACTERS"!!!!!!!!!!

The mainstream actors have no respect for the people who slog behind the camera in the making of a film, especially the stuntmen. It is said that the stuntmen perform daring stunts, at times without much protection all for a paltry emolument. These stuntmen are needed in a movie because, the “HERO” cannot afford to perform stunts and risk his life as the producer has invested a lot of money on him! There have been reports saying that these people are not even served enough food on the sets while the “STARS” only need to order as to what is it that they need at their disposal. The “HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION” does not seem to have complaints when the stunts performed by unknown people appears to have been performed by the stars,  on the screen, without adequate recognition or payment to the real heroes of an action movie. The plight of these people is so bad that they dare not to ask for more emoluments or even food and security or protection on the sets even when they are hurt as they fear that the producers may refrain from hiring them for the next venture due to their “arrogance” . Absolutely no award such as the “Best Performer of Stunts” is conferred on them.

After having noted the harsh reality associated with the film industry I feel that it would be best to shut it once for all, as it would prevent fame and money from being trapped with unworthy people called actors or stars among them ( To hell with them all!!!). By doing so, the people are not being deprived of entertainment as one would still have a lot of options in the form of pubs, bars, restaurants or live bands ; these are certainly better than the cinema industry as they have no qualms in shelling out any amount of money in the form of trade license or excise duties which are a potential source of revenue to the government unlike the cinema people who land on the streets when taxes are imposed on them. The media certainly would get enough time to indulge in some productive work as a whole lot of unworthy people are wiped out of their scope. As a compensatory move, the government could step in to provide aid to the small time actors who really have been or are indeed struggling to make a living by reposing faith in the industry of fools. Animation films could be encouraged as they glorify the use of technology in entertainment without casting the ills of stardom on the society. Importantly, it would aid the youth in wasting time and money on visiting theaters to watch unworthy fools. We would no longer have people who would burn buses to exhibit their frustration when their iconic star is kidnapped or dead. Students would need not bunk exams to pray for their recovery when their superstars are being treated in hospitals. Everyone would just go about their work!!!!!!!

Film Industry -1


“Industrialize and perish”    - Mahatma Gandhi

“Industrialize or perish”      - Sir M Visvesvaraya

The seemingly contradicting views of the two noble Indians are not what I am concerned about while writing this- at least less perfectly so ; there is one industry operational across the world, which satisfies the views of the former more aptly than the latter and that is the film industry. When Sir MV made the above statement in the context of the Indian economy, he certainly would not have thought of movies. Earlier (as far as I remember, even in my younger days) not many people were acquainted with the term ‘industry’ in the regard of films. However, as the days advanced, the number of films being made increased manifold and the money spent on them was enormous. People who were involved in their making turned out to be ‘celebrities’ and the importance attached to them hit a new high. The changes were witnessed not merely with the people on stage, but off stage as well. Individuals, who produced or funded movies are now a thing of the past. The corporate culture has sent its foot into the world of cinema and hence what we have now is not an individual or a group as ‘producers’, but an entire company as a ‘production house’ which has a CEO, a spokesperson, manager etc.! Thus, the 'film world' turned into a 'film industry'.

In India, we had films with a certain run time (usually 3 hours or close to it) with a storyline that had lots of drama, songs, fights etc. The actors then, usually had a background of the theatre, because of which their histrionics and oration were perfect. As time passed, the run time of the movies came down and so did the level of originality. In a bid to make fast-paced movies of the action and thriller genre, people started looking at films from Britain and Hollywood but it was still a good trend as a native touch was given to the story which certainly had a soul. The quality was'nt really lost. Cinema continued to be a fancy, an experience for the audience which would allow them to witness something that was not or could never possibly be a part of their lives. Simultaneously we had parallel cinema that intended to convey a socially relevant message to everyone but had a very small audience due to their slow pace or lack of songs and dance or fight scenes.

It was after all this that we witnessed a new wave of cinema where-in the themes revolved around what people witnessed in everyday life or “something which the audience could relate themselves to”, to quote the film makers of today which was a complete reversal of the trend.  The only way in which people can relate to the movies of today, especially the ones from ‘Bollywood’ is by means of love affairs. The singles living in big cities either as students or employees who hang around together or get a hangover at pubs or parties, smoke, booze or even get into physical intimacy are the themes doing rounds in the movies today. No doubt, this is what is happening in the creamy layer of the society today but going to watch a movie to witness something that is essentially a part of our lives, seems rather stupid. Of course, there were certain absurd elements in the cinema of the yester-years as well, where-in guys danced around girls in colleges or fought with the baddies who had cast their lustful eye on the heroine, without the fear of the management throwing them out. These guys (the baddies in the college) had a very funny dress code that involved a blue jeans with a jacket worn on a black or a brown vest!!! As a rule, they were not supposed to have haircut.  There were many more absurd elements like these ( I propose to mention a few that occur to me as and when I continue writing ).

The villains of the movies could have sons (who were as villainous as their father) but not a wife. When 2 people sat down for a conversation in melancholy to discuss their dead parents on a clear dark night, 2 stars had to be mandatorily shining brighter than all the others in the sky as both had the obligation of comforting each other by showing the stars, which essentially were their parents watching them! We no longer have ‘mod’ girls who take the “indifferent for love” kind of guys on a drive prompting them to say “I love you” and when he does’nt (Remember we had such men too), threatens to lose her life by speeding up the car in such a way that it could take the lives out of anyone and everyone, all of whom are in no way linked with the matter. Consequently the guys do not get to stop the mad drive and say “Stop thinking of me, as you may never know the dangers that are lurking around me” as he is presumably under constant threat from the villains. The girl replies in passion, her preparedness to die in his arms after which they sing a song in Switzerland. Nearly 150- 160 minutes after the movie starts, the villains had the obligation of kidnapping everyone associated with the hero so that they could ask him to come over to a place which was far from the city, well connected by a highway (so that he could zoom along nervously putting up a bold face), had lots of drums and boxes well arranged (so that they could all fall when the hero punches the people), a good number of henchmen, gunmen and last but not the least, enough place to hurl grenades as and when the hero runs. In a nutshell, offering the hero, an opportunity to settle scores and losing out to him, so that the film is ends in 3 hours, was what the most powerful villain had to do. The comparatively weaker ones could be dead halfway through the film. Despite all the above odds, the films then had their own soul and the people who performed in them, were truly artists and not merely actors.


                                              *****Continued in the next post****